The best balances ( ) are definitely the Unfaithfulness Problems Questionnaire (IDQ; Buss et al
When it comes to dimension of close jealousy, from the forty worry about-declaration tool had been reported since creation of brand new Care about-Statement and you will Projective Envy Scales ( Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979 ). Of many products were used only when. , 1992 ) created to determine gender distinctions; brand new Multidimensional Envy Level ( Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989 ) built to measure the about three dimensions of envy (cognitive, psychological and behavioural size); the fresh new Twitter Envy Level ( Muise, Christofides, & Des ) intended for comparing the probability of a meeting that triggers attitude out of jealousy people about their craft to your Facebook; the fresh new Jealousy Size ( Buunk, 1997 ), accustomed examine about three particular envy (activated, nervous and you may precautionary) plus the Interpersonal Envy Measure (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981 ), which evaluates the brand new negative feeling due to actual or threatened losses out of a loved individual a competitor. All the tool listed above have indicated adequate degrees of validity and you will accuracy.
Mathes and Severa (1981) establish a couple degree, and also the basic research did the building of scale with 39 products, that has been reduced in order to twenty-eight activities immediately after statistical study
Within the Mexico, good Multidimensional Way of measuring Jealousy ( Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989 ) could have been elaborated and you will a primary research was completed with brand new Multidimensional Collection away from Close Jealousy ( Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016 ). When you look at the Brazil, the fresh Close Jealousy Inventory is actually revised ( Bueno & Carvalho, 2012 ) In terms of Colombia, there aren’t any psychometric knowledge off a particular level with the personal jealousy. As well, early in the day degree don’t perform Factorial Confirmatory Investigation (CFA) so as to validate new grounds design located, and you will reduced reliability accounts was indeed utilized in the products (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) otherwise short products were utilized (Mota mais aussi al., 2016).
On the Latin american framework, there can be a variation into the Chile of the List out of Behaviors of Partners That can cause Jealousy ( Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014 )
New IJS install having Mathes and you will Severa (1981) is one of the most made use of balances to possess researching personal jealousy, they receive six issues one to measure the sensitivity so you’re able to risks related to: (a) Partner’s cheating and dating others (issues 1, step three, a dozen, 14, fifteen, jollyromance Girls 16, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you can twenty five); (b) Partner’s popularity (factors dos, step 3, 4, seven, 10, 13, 17, 20, and you can 23); (c) A keen untrustworthy lover (things step one, cuatro, six, 19, and you may 21); (d) Partner’s old times (facts 11, 24, twenty six, twenty seven, and you will 28); (e) Lover’s indifference (facts 8, nine and you can 24); and you can (f) Partner’s kept relatives with old schedules and you can sex variations (circumstances 5 and 18).
You’ll find five degree which have tested with respect to the precision and you can authenticity. Subsequently, in a moment study, IJS was utilized next to other bills one evaluated close like-website links, low self-esteem, self-regard and you will a random survey out-of separate identities, verifying, according to principle, that advanced from jealousy, the better the degree of Intimate like and also the reduced the separate title of your couple. Within this analysis, i declaration a beneficial coefficient from precision out-of .ninety five into complete measure. When you look at the a third study, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you will Dick (1982) , so you can continue the brand new symptoms from validity, made use of the IJS as well as 2 behavioural measures: (a) risk when exposed to a rival and you may (b) words out-of possessiveness into the companion, using a telephone call which they made to the person who participated in the analysis. New asked correlations was basically obtained, and therefore once more served the fresh authenticity of level. In the long run, when you look at the a fourth studies, Mathes, Roter and Joerger (1982) substantiated the newest convergent authenticity regarding IJS with other balances one to examined intimate envy.
Deixe uma resposta
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!