Contract, keyword order, and conjunction in a number of designs of Arabic

• ^ The 5 sandwich-form of fillers was: crossbreed agreement nouns with a possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s neighbor,” in which komsija can be produce Yards otherwise F agreement), like in (15b); crossbreed contract nouns with a great possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my personal laugher,” where cerekalo can be trigger Meters otherwise Letter agreement), such as (15c); NSg animate nouns having a keen ordinal amount [prvo prase “(the) basic pig,” where prase keeps a hybrid plural mode, causing FSg or NPl agreement], such as (15d); normal agreement nouns with good MSg moderate complement [uspeh dekana “(the) triumph (of the) dean,” where the genitive match was homonymous into paucal, additionally the paucal lets paucal and you can MPl contract], such as (15e); normal arrangement MSg nouns which have a PP complement (prijatelj iz skole “the newest buddy regarding university,” in which attraction consequences could well be requested), such as (15f).
• ^ The fresh new salience of the advice is actually managed throughout the pursuing the method. Basic, one journalist devised the brand new examples according to her instinct, plus the other evaluated them; in which dispute came up, advice had been changed while the process try regular into the recently delivered examples.
• ^ The importance of the difference between contract activities when you look at the condition are orthogonal with the hypotheses throughout the interest of your own report mГ© vysvД›tlenГ­, because they simply build forecasts towards cousin quantities amongst the standards, or involving the standards in addition to legs-line rates. I declaration these evaluation in the interests of completeness of your report, as advised from the writers of the frequency.
• ^ I have designed and you can administered a special test along these lines, so we are currently considering the information.

Records

Arsenijevic, B., and you may Mitic, We. (2016a). “Effectation of animacy and agentivity for the processing out-of agreement from inside the Serbo-Croatian,” inside the Training from inside the Dialects and you may Notice, Chosen documents of 3rd Novi Unfortunate Workshop into the Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and you may Health-related Linguistic Lookup, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and you may S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Sad: Professors from Philosophy), 41–77.

Arsenijevic, B., and you can Mitic, I. (2016b). On the within the dependence of sex regarding amount inside arrangement that have paired subjects: an experimental investigation. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty four, 41–69.

Ba). Morphology, agreement and dealing memories retrieval in phrase design: proof away from intercourse and situation in Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.

Hairdresser, H., and you will Carreiras, Yards. (2005). Grammatical sex and you can number contract for the Language: An ERP investigations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.

Bhatt, R., and you may Walkow, Meters. (2013). Finding agreement when you look at the sentence structure: a quarrel out-of agreement when you look at the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Principle 30, 951–1013.

Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim i postponiranim predikatom you srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.

Lme4: Linear Mixed-Outcomes Activities Using S4 Classes

Carminati, Meters. (2005). Processing reflexes of one’s feature ladder (person > amount > gender) and you may ramifications having linguistic idea. Lingua 115, 259–285.

Chomsky, Letter. (2001). “Derivation from the Stage,” from inside the Ken Hale. A lives in the Language, ed. Meters. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Force), 1–52.

Citko, B. (2004). “Agreement asymmetries into the enhance formations,” in Specialized Remedies for Slavic linguistics: The fresh new Ottawa Conference 2003, eds An effective. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Courses), 91–108.

De- Vincenzi, M. (1999). Differences between the latest morphology off sex and amount: research from starting coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 28, 537–553.

De- Vincenzi, Yards., and you will Di Domenico, Elizabeth. (1999). A distinction one of ?-features: the part off sex and count throughout the retrieval off pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. eleven, 41–74.

Doron, E. (2000). “VSO and you will leftover-conjunct contract : biblical Hebrew against. progressive Hebrew,” regarding the Syntax of one’s Verb 1st Languages, eds A good. Carnie and you can Elizabeth. Guilfoyle (New york, NY: Oxford University Press), 75–96.