The best balances ( ) are definitely the Unfaithfulness Problems Questionnaire (IDQ; Buss et al
When it comes to dimension of close jealousy, from the forty worry about-declaration tool had been reported since creation of brand new Care about-Statement and you will Projective Envy Scales ( Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979 ). Of many products were used only when. , 1992 ) created to determine gender distinctions; brand new Multidimensional Envy Level ( Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989 ) built to measure the about three dimensions of envy (cognitive, psychological and behavioural size); the fresh new Twitter Envy Level ( Muise, Christofides, & Des ) intended for comparing the probability of a meeting that triggers attitude out of jealousy people about their craft to your Facebook; the fresh new Jealousy Size ( Buunk, 1997 ), accustomed examine about three particular envy (activated, nervous and you may precautionary) plus the Interpersonal Envy Measure (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981 ), which evaluates the brand new negative feeling due to actual or threatened losses out of a loved individual a competitor. All the tool listed above have indicated adequate degrees of validity and you will accuracy.
Mathes and Severa (1981) establish a couple degree, and also the basic research did the building of scale with 39 products, that has been reduced in order to twenty-eight activities immediately after statistical study
Within the Mexico, good Multidimensional Way of measuring Jealousy ( Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989 ) could have been elaborated and you will a primary research was completed with brand new Multidimensional Collection away from Close Jealousy ( Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016 ). When you look at the Brazil, the fresh Close Jealousy Inventory is actually revised ( Bueno & Carvalho, 2012 ) In terms of Colombia, there aren’t any psychometric knowledge off a particular level with the personal jealousy. Leia mais